 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | 02-05-2015 |
| Location: | Saint Augustine, Florida USA |
| Posts: | 169 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
Nigel, thanks for your help once again.
| View single post by Bfitz241 | |||||||||||||
| Posted: 11-05-2016 01:25 am |
|
||||||||||||
Bfitz241
|
If I may, I would like to ask for clarification on one point. As I understand the text of Des Hammil's book, when an emulsion tube is referred to as "richer", it will have either fewer, or smaller, emulsion holes than a tube which is labelled "leaner". Am I correct in that assumption? Nigel, thanks for your help once again.
|
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||